Pig Trials: Justice or Superstition?

Medieval legal systems could prosecute animals under both ecclesiastical and secular courts. Theologians and jurists debated whether animals had intent—some argued they could be possessed by the Devil, a popular explanation for especially brutal attacks. The Church occasionally ordered excommunications or curses on swarms of rats or locusts, while pigs that killed humans were tried, sometimes with legal representation.

The execution of pigs served multiple purposes: it delivered justice to grieving families, restored communal order, and offered moral instruction to the populace. A pig dressed in human clothing being executed was a grotesque performance of justice, but also a warning—both against negligence and against the chaos that lurked within the city’s own household animals.

Symbolism of the Swine: Between Order and Chaos


The image of a pig as a house demon or devil-in-disguise was not purely legal. In medieval art and literature, pigs were often associated with gluttony, sin, and the grotesque. They were considered unclean in both religious and physical terms. Yet, paradoxically, they were also part of everyday domestic life.

This duality made pigs a potent symbol. When a pig turned on a child—innocence embodied—it was interpreted as more than an accident. It became a sign of divine wrath, or a manifestation of disorder breaching the fragile veneer of urban Christian civilization.

Pigs were frequently used in morality plays, sermons, and fables as symbols of untamed desire and carnal danger. The killer pig, then, was not merely a beast; it was a metaphor for human vice, unchecked appetite, or even the demonic. shutdown123

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *